Borrowed Hindsight
Career myths · · By Borrowed Hindsight

Is the 10,000-hour rule true?

Practise 10,000 hours and you'll be world-class. The scientist behind the original study said that's not what he found.

The story

A 2008 bestseller made it famous: practise for 10,000 hours and you'll be world-class at anything.

But in the original 1993 study by Anders Ericsson and colleagues, 10,000 hours was an average, for the best violinists by age 20. It wasn't a threshold, and plenty of them had practised less. Ericsson later wrote that the popular rule misread his work.

In 2014, a review of 88 studies found practice explained about 12% of the differences in performance overall, and under 1% in professions. Practice matters, but how you practise matters more than how long.

The borrowed hindsightHours aren't the point. Focused practice, with feedback, is.

Before you count hours, ask:

  • Am I practising, or just repeating?
  • Who is giving me feedback?

Watch the video

Questions people ask

Where does the 10,000-hour rule come from?

It was popularised by a 2008 bestselling book, based on a 1993 study by Anders Ericsson and colleagues of violinists.

Is the 10,000-hour rule true?

Not as a rule. In the original study, 10,000 hours was an average for the best violinists by age 20, not a threshold. A 2014 review of 88 studies found practice explained about 12% of differences in performance overall, and under 1% in professions.

What kind of practice works best?

Researchers point to deliberate practice: focused effort on specific weaknesses, with feedback, rather than simply repeating what you already do.